freddyCR
March 1st, 2005, 05:02 PM
I almost fell into the scenery in this one.
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/medium/depth_8x6_L.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/medium/depth_8x6_L.jpg
wallpaper megan fox hair. megan fox hair
idd
09-18 09:10 PM
poor guy... =\
WeShallOvercome
07-27 01:54 PM
See this from FAQ1 released by USCIS itself
Q6: What happens if an application is filed at the wrong Service Center?
A6. Forms I-485 should be filed at either the Texas or Nebraska Service Centers. However, through August 17, 2007 only, employment-based adjustment applications filed at the California and Vermont Service Centers will not be rejected and will be relocated to the appropriate Service Center. Filing at the wrong location could result in processing delays.
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/EBFAQ1.pdf
I think you'll only lose 1-2 weeks as far as your RD is concered..
Q6: What happens if an application is filed at the wrong Service Center?
A6. Forms I-485 should be filed at either the Texas or Nebraska Service Centers. However, through August 17, 2007 only, employment-based adjustment applications filed at the California and Vermont Service Centers will not be rejected and will be relocated to the appropriate Service Center. Filing at the wrong location could result in processing delays.
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/EBFAQ1.pdf
I think you'll only lose 1-2 weeks as far as your RD is concered..
2011 girlfriend Megan Fox Hair
jaewonj
04-01 10:26 AM
I'm in my 3rd year of my first H1-B which will be expired Sep. 2011.
If I transfer my H1-B now to another company, then do I automatically get another 3 years or do I have to file an extension after my H1-B has been transferred?
Thanks
-J
If I transfer my H1-B now to another company, then do I automatically get another 3 years or do I have to file an extension after my H1-B has been transferred?
Thanks
-J
more...
saibaba
12-04 12:06 PM
In the I-140, Immigration Petition for Alien Worker, under �Basic information about proposed employment�, in the �Wages per week� column it is written as $XX,XXX/yr.
Is this the amount my employer offered in the full time position that he offered while processing my GC?
Do I have to make sure my salary with new employer should be more than $XX,XXX/yr?
Also my original employer who filed my GC mentioned my designation as Software Engineer � Applications, Do I need to have same designation in the new firm? Or can it be anything under Software Engineering like design, programming, analysis,developer,data quality,testing etc?
Is this the amount my employer offered in the full time position that he offered while processing my GC?
Do I have to make sure my salary with new employer should be more than $XX,XXX/yr?
Also my original employer who filed my GC mentioned my designation as Software Engineer � Applications, Do I need to have same designation in the new firm? Or can it be anything under Software Engineering like design, programming, analysis,developer,data quality,testing etc?
bestin
02-10 03:19 PM
Hi All,
My online status for I-140 petition comes up with this weird status.
Your Current Case Status for Form I140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER
Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.
On Feburary 7th, 2011 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service.
Any idea what this could be?
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks in advance!!
JV
My last update in Oct 08 shows the same now.It was approved.So relax and enjoy.
My online status for I-140 petition comes up with this weird status.
Your Current Case Status for Form I140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER
Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.
On Feburary 7th, 2011 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service.
Any idea what this could be?
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks in advance!!
JV
My last update in Oct 08 shows the same now.It was approved.So relax and enjoy.
more...
manderson
07-17 01:04 PM
I wonder if there are any provisions in there that can indirectly help our backlogs as well? Text of bill: http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22907
This has passed House and I was reading in Oh's site that President will sign it soon. Is it possible to throw in some indirect 485 backlog reduction provisions in there?
Oh's report:
07/17/2007: Passport Processing Meltdown to Receive Some Help from Retired Diplomats
Currently, the department is receiving more than 1 million passport applications a month and holds a backlog of about 500,000 that have been pending more than 10 weeks, instead of the usual six to eight The Senate passed S. 966 bill late last month to allow State to rehire retired Foreign Service employees to staff overwhelmed passport processing centers across the country. Retirees now have little incentive to return because current law cuts their salaries by the amount of their pensions. The House yesterday agreed to the Senate bill and passed it yesterday which is likely to grant the State Department the flexibility to rehire retired and fully trained passport processors on a temporary basis to help existing processors manage the increased demand. The President is likely to sign the quickly. Read on (http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37485&dcn=todaysnews) (http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37485&dcn=todaysnews).
Probably I am jumping the gun here but if I am not, hope this post won't hurt IV's agenda.
This has passed House and I was reading in Oh's site that President will sign it soon. Is it possible to throw in some indirect 485 backlog reduction provisions in there?
Oh's report:
07/17/2007: Passport Processing Meltdown to Receive Some Help from Retired Diplomats
Currently, the department is receiving more than 1 million passport applications a month and holds a backlog of about 500,000 that have been pending more than 10 weeks, instead of the usual six to eight The Senate passed S. 966 bill late last month to allow State to rehire retired Foreign Service employees to staff overwhelmed passport processing centers across the country. Retirees now have little incentive to return because current law cuts their salaries by the amount of their pensions. The House yesterday agreed to the Senate bill and passed it yesterday which is likely to grant the State Department the flexibility to rehire retired and fully trained passport processors on a temporary basis to help existing processors manage the increased demand. The President is likely to sign the quickly. Read on (http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37485&dcn=todaysnews) (http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37485&dcn=todaysnews).
Probably I am jumping the gun here but if I am not, hope this post won't hurt IV's agenda.
2010 hot megan fox hair updos.
kgully1
October 18th, 2005, 10:04 AM
A very impressive result Gary. Time and creative energy well spent!
more...
h_shaik
10-25 01:48 PM
bump
hair megan fox hair updos_09.
simple1
06-23 01:42 PM
While I laugh at that guy. I would like to remind you that we are living in a republic and not in a democracy.
Any one can be a self hurting fool using his/her "Individual�s God-given, unalienable rights". While in a democracy individuals worry about majority rule and popular thought.
I dont understand why Obama (a former senior lecturer in constitutional law ) refers to this country as democracy.
HELLO Chicago. If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer... "
While the founders were fearful of democracy ( the mob rule ).
Both India and USA are republics not democracies.
Any one can be a self hurting fool using his/her "Individual�s God-given, unalienable rights". While in a democracy individuals worry about majority rule and popular thought.
I dont understand why Obama (a former senior lecturer in constitutional law ) refers to this country as democracy.
HELLO Chicago. If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer... "
While the founders were fearful of democracy ( the mob rule ).
Both India and USA are republics not democracies.
more...
mlrrr
08-24 06:39 PM
Hi All,
My employment based I-485 application has been pending since Aug'2004. My labor priority date is May 2003. I came to know from immigration officer from local office few weeks ago that name check process was cleared very recently. But, USCIS has responded to a recent service request as follows:
The processing of your case has been delayed. We are currently awaiting the results of required security checks on this case. These background checks are required of all who apply for the immigration benefit your are seeking. We will make every effort to make a decision on this case as soon as security checks are complete. If you do not receive a decision or other notice of action from us within 6 months of this letter, please contact us by calling our customer service number provided down below.
If name check is cleared what else is pending? Is information provided by the immigration officer at local USCIS is wrong regarding the security checks.
Could you please throw some light on these background checks. What are my options. How many more years do i have to wait? Your valuable information in this regard is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
MLRRR
My employment based I-485 application has been pending since Aug'2004. My labor priority date is May 2003. I came to know from immigration officer from local office few weeks ago that name check process was cleared very recently. But, USCIS has responded to a recent service request as follows:
The processing of your case has been delayed. We are currently awaiting the results of required security checks on this case. These background checks are required of all who apply for the immigration benefit your are seeking. We will make every effort to make a decision on this case as soon as security checks are complete. If you do not receive a decision or other notice of action from us within 6 months of this letter, please contact us by calling our customer service number provided down below.
If name check is cleared what else is pending? Is information provided by the immigration officer at local USCIS is wrong regarding the security checks.
Could you please throw some light on these background checks. What are my options. How many more years do i have to wait? Your valuable information in this regard is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
MLRRR
hot Elegant loose updo Megan Fox
martinvisalaw
06-11 04:52 PM
Hi Attorneys,
Recently I have filed my H1B petition . However due to some emergency I need to quit my current organisation (Company A) who has sponsored the H1B . My questions are :
1. Would there be any adverse effect if in future Company B files H1B for me ?
2. What generally happens if I file H1B and am not able to attend the interview ?
3. Is there any way Company A can revoke the H1B petition after I resign before H1B interview ?
Would appreciate a quick a reply .
1. There shouldn't be any negative consequences if you change from one H-1B employer to another. People do this all the time.
2. What "interview" do you refer to? If you mean a visa interview at the consulate, you should cancel if you cannot attend.
3. Company A can and should withdraw the H-1B petition once you leave the company. This should not affect you getting new H-1B status, assuming there is no major gap between leaving Company A and Company B filing the new petition.
Recently I have filed my H1B petition . However due to some emergency I need to quit my current organisation (Company A) who has sponsored the H1B . My questions are :
1. Would there be any adverse effect if in future Company B files H1B for me ?
2. What generally happens if I file H1B and am not able to attend the interview ?
3. Is there any way Company A can revoke the H1B petition after I resign before H1B interview ?
Would appreciate a quick a reply .
1. There shouldn't be any negative consequences if you change from one H-1B employer to another. People do this all the time.
2. What "interview" do you refer to? If you mean a visa interview at the consulate, you should cancel if you cannot attend.
3. Company A can and should withdraw the H-1B petition once you leave the company. This should not affect you getting new H-1B status, assuming there is no major gap between leaving Company A and Company B filing the new petition.
more...
house pictures megan fox hair updos.
bestin
10-24 08:16 AM
Hi
This is my first post and I would like to know if there will be any issue if the name on SSN & EAD not matching?
i.e.
My Name On
FirstName MiddleName LastName
SSN is : RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD BARU
LastName FirstName MiddleName
EAD is : BARU RAMAKRISHNA P
Thanks and appreciate for your help in advance.
Whats wrong with this.Ur last name is still Baru .In my old L2 EAD I see c,a b where c is my last name ,a my first name and b my middle initial.There should be a comma after your lastname in EAD card right?U r OK.
This is my first post and I would like to know if there will be any issue if the name on SSN & EAD not matching?
i.e.
My Name On
FirstName MiddleName LastName
SSN is : RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD BARU
LastName FirstName MiddleName
EAD is : BARU RAMAKRISHNA P
Thanks and appreciate for your help in advance.
Whats wrong with this.Ur last name is still Baru .In my old L2 EAD I see c,a b where c is my last name ,a my first name and b my middle initial.There should be a comma after your lastname in EAD card right?U r OK.
tattoo hairstyles megan fox hair
Blog Feeds
08-12 09:50 AM
H-1B visas are work visas that allow foreign nationals to temporarily work in the United States for a U.S. employer. A U.S. employer may petition a foreign national under the H-1B classification which specifically applies to individuals in a “specialty occupation." A specialty occupation has three requirements. First, an individual must have a bachelor’s degree or higher degree or its equivalent for the particular position. Second, the degree must be common in the industry among similar organizations. Third, the employer must normally require a degree or equivalent; or the nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with attainment of the degree.
Individuals with H-1B visas are allowed to work in the United States for up to six years, but visas are granted in three-year increments. In some cases, the H-1B visas may be extended for more than six years. If the individual is in the United States, a change of status to an H-1B is filed in the United States. If the individual is outside the United States, upon approval of the petition, the individual must apply for an H-1B visa at the U.S. consulate. There are only 65,000 H-1B visas issued per year.
The beginning of the fiscal year for 2010 is October 1, 2009. Employers may begin filing their petitions six months prior to the start date of employment but the individuals cannot start their jobs until October 1.
It is vital for those individuals wishing to work in the United States to begin preparing their H-1B paperwork before the cap is reached. As of August 7, 2009, approximately 44,900 H-1B cap-subject petitions had been received by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and counted towards the cap. Please call us at 214-999-9999 if you would like to begin the H-1B process. The H-1B cap-subject count is available at the USCIS Web site (http://www.uscis.gov).
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/sxKBR-m_Kpk/)
Individuals with H-1B visas are allowed to work in the United States for up to six years, but visas are granted in three-year increments. In some cases, the H-1B visas may be extended for more than six years. If the individual is in the United States, a change of status to an H-1B is filed in the United States. If the individual is outside the United States, upon approval of the petition, the individual must apply for an H-1B visa at the U.S. consulate. There are only 65,000 H-1B visas issued per year.
The beginning of the fiscal year for 2010 is October 1, 2009. Employers may begin filing their petitions six months prior to the start date of employment but the individuals cannot start their jobs until October 1.
It is vital for those individuals wishing to work in the United States to begin preparing their H-1B paperwork before the cap is reached. As of August 7, 2009, approximately 44,900 H-1B cap-subject petitions had been received by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and counted towards the cap. Please call us at 214-999-9999 if you would like to begin the H-1B process. The H-1B cap-subject count is available at the USCIS Web site (http://www.uscis.gov).
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/sxKBR-m_Kpk/)
more...
pictures hair updos. megan fox hair
pmpforgc
04-09 10:53 PM
I just came across this on youtube. Hope you enjoy and appreciate her skills.
She had made nice poem out of reality that we face.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9W1j5NCy9s
She had made nice poem out of reality that we face.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9W1j5NCy9s
dresses megan fox hair updos.
roseball
04-03 04:30 PM
Recently my I-140 petition for EB2 was denied on educational grounds . The employer opened an MTR/appeal.
Is it possible to re-file the I-140 petition in EB3 using the same labor certification, while the first I-140 is pending appeal at AAO.
Not while an appeal is pending. Even then, it depends on what the job and educational requirements were on the labor application. What was the reason for EB-2 I-140 denial?
Is it possible to re-file the I-140 petition in EB3 using the same labor certification, while the first I-140 is pending appeal at AAO.
Not while an appeal is pending. Even then, it depends on what the job and educational requirements were on the labor application. What was the reason for EB-2 I-140 denial?
more...
makeup hair. megan fox
johnggberg
07-20 02:43 PM
but visa dates may get retrogressed again than Priority date will play role
girlfriend images pictures megan fox hair
natika
04-27 03:22 PM
Hi,
My I-140 will be approved shortly in premium processing and I'll be applying for 3yr H1 extension. There is a chance that I may get laid-off soon and I wanted to know if I can change the jobs while my H1 extension petition is pending with USICS. My current H1 will expire in June'07.
Sorry, if I am asking a question that has already been addressed here. I tried to browse the forum but could not find anything.
Thanks,
Natika
My I-140 will be approved shortly in premium processing and I'll be applying for 3yr H1 extension. There is a chance that I may get laid-off soon and I wanted to know if I can change the jobs while my H1 extension petition is pending with USICS. My current H1 will expire in June'07.
Sorry, if I am asking a question that has already been addressed here. I tried to browse the forum but could not find anything.
Thanks,
Natika
hairstyles megan fox hair updos.
ubetman
05-26 03:30 PM
Same TSC...
Blog Feeds
09-10 07:50 PM
Hunton Immigration and Nationality Law Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
On July 1, 2010, the Vital Statistics Office of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico began issuing new, more secure Puerto Rican birth certificates to US Citizens born in Puerto Rico. As of October 1, 2010, all certified copies of Puerto Rican birth certificates issued prior to July 1, 2010, will no longer be valid. Accordingly, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a press release providing guidance to US employers with regard to the I-9 process. For new employees, employers may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates through September 30, 2010; after that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates (issued on or after July 1, 2010) we be acceptable for I-9 purposes. Therefore, as of October 1, 2010, employers must pay close attention to the issuance date of Puerto Rican birth certificates presented for I-9 purposes.
For existing employees, there is no need to re-verify the employment authorization of employees who previously presented pre-July 1, 2010, Puerto Rican birth certificates. Federal Contractors subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation E-Verify clause may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates prior to October 1, 2010, but beginning on that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates issued on or after July 1, 2010, will be acceptable. Federal Contractors may not ask for the newer version during I-9 reverification of those individuals who previously presented the older version of the Puerto Rican birth certificates.
The USCIS memo can be found here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=45e3285ca77fa210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/25g-Wwo_N40
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/25g-Wwo_N40/)
On July 1, 2010, the Vital Statistics Office of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico began issuing new, more secure Puerto Rican birth certificates to US Citizens born in Puerto Rico. As of October 1, 2010, all certified copies of Puerto Rican birth certificates issued prior to July 1, 2010, will no longer be valid. Accordingly, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a press release providing guidance to US employers with regard to the I-9 process. For new employees, employers may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates through September 30, 2010; after that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates (issued on or after July 1, 2010) we be acceptable for I-9 purposes. Therefore, as of October 1, 2010, employers must pay close attention to the issuance date of Puerto Rican birth certificates presented for I-9 purposes.
For existing employees, there is no need to re-verify the employment authorization of employees who previously presented pre-July 1, 2010, Puerto Rican birth certificates. Federal Contractors subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation E-Verify clause may continue to accept all Puerto Rican birth certificates prior to October 1, 2010, but beginning on that date, only the new Puerto Rican birth certificates issued on or after July 1, 2010, will be acceptable. Federal Contractors may not ask for the newer version during I-9 reverification of those individuals who previously presented the older version of the Puerto Rican birth certificates.
The USCIS memo can be found here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=45e3285ca77fa210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD).
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~4/25g-Wwo_N40
More... (http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/HuntonImmigrationAndNationalityLawBlog/~3/25g-Wwo_N40/)
arihant
03-14 12:54 PM
Did IV and/or QGA or anyone else attend this event? if so, do you have an update for the rest of us? Thanks a lot.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий